What does the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling for Metis and non-status Indians look like?

What does the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling for Metis and non-status Indians look like?

A landmark victory for the Metis nation in Canada to move forward with national recognition.

 

The Supreme Court of Canada unanimously ruled that more than 600,000 Metis and non-status Indians may gain benefits, legal rights and funding opportunities through federal government jurisdiction on Thursday, April 14th.

 

Who qualifies Metis and how is it proven?

 

According to the Metis National Council website, “Metis” means a person who self-identifies as Metis, is distinct from other Aboriginal Peoples by having a combination of ancestry from both European and Canadian ancestry as well as is of historic Metis Nation ancestry with the community’s acceptance.

 

In addition to having an ancestral component, a connection to the Metis community remains vital for those who wish to prove their connection to history remains alive and well, as many people in modern times have ties to their historical roots.

 

There is now a database with historical records that trace records of people back to the Metis Nation dating back to the 1900s, which allows some applicants to apply for Metis Citizenship.

 

Who qualifies as a non-status Indian and how is it proven?

 

Non-status Indians is a term that commonly refers to people who identify themselves as Indians, which includes some First Nation members, but typically have not been allowed to register under the Indian Act, according to Indigenous and Northern Affairs Canada.

 

Those who were descendants of Indian women that lost their status during marriage to a Caucasian man, joined the ranks of the Army or some religious traditions and even those who earned a university degree could now qualify for rights to benefits, social programs and services offered through federal agencies.

 

What does it mean?

 

The Daniels decision does not mean that non-status Indians and Metis people have become Indians.

 

Instead, the Supreme Court of Canada’s ruling classifies that both groups have become a constitutional responsibility of the federal government as non-status Indians and Metis as now listed under section 91(24) of the Constitution.

 

That means non-status Indians and Metis now will have access to federal funding opportunities, but neither group has gained the right to live on reserve or  to be governed by the Indian Act. However, there will be an opportunity for both groups of people to negotiate their future rights with the federal government.

 

Just Posted

The end of an Echo

Invermere Valley Echo shuts down operations in Columbia Valley

Creating a new narrative for Canal Flats

Economic development consultant hired, lists vision for next 90 days

UPDATE: Crews battle as wildfires rage in B.C. Interior

Crews brace for another day on B.C. firelines as no let up is likely

VIDEO: B.C. wildfires by the numbers

Wildfires continue to engulf regions of B.C.’s forests and communities.

VIDEO: More than 180 wildfires burning across B.C.

Firefighters from other provinces called in to assist

DTSS Grad March 2017

DTSS Grad March 2017

59 cats seized in Chase

59 neglected and injured cats were seized from a property in Chase

Soundgarden singer Chris Cornell dead at age 52

The singer/songwriter passed away early Thursday morning in Detroit

Paying tribute to a primeval passage

Uninterrupted celebrates the Adams River sockeye run in an extraordinary way.

UPDATE: Pemberton Music Festival cancelled, no automatic refunds

In the past, the music festival located in Pemberton drew large crowds last year of 180,000 fans

Medical wait times cost B.C. patients $2,300 each

New Fraser Institute report places B.C. at second worst in costs associated with long wait times

UPDATE: 22 killed at Ariana Grande concert

Witnesses reported hearing two loud bangs coming from near the arena’s bars at about 10:35 p.m.

One in three Canadian high school students have rode with drinking drivers, study reveals

Nearly one in five rode with a driver who’d been smoking pot

Top court to hear federal government’s appeal on residential school records

A lower court judge ruled to destroy the stories after 15 years unless consent is given to preserve

Most Read